The few, the proud...

Doesn't fit in the other categories? Maybe just want to post up some humor or random happening? This is the place for it.
User avatar
ssracer
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 13804
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:24 pm
Location: KY
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 61 times
Contact:

The few, the proud...

Post by ssracer » Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:04 am

Marines delay female fitness plan after half of recruits fail...can't do the three pull up minimum, so we have to make it easier...SMH

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01 ... llup-test/

Since I'm not in the military and have never been in combat I generally try to stay out of the "women in the military" debate. But I will say that IMO if women are going to be in the same position as the men, expected to complete the same tasks in battle, then they sure as hell should have to meet the same physical standards as their male counterparts.

Rem700
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 13354
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 am
Location: Definitely at my soul crushing job!
Has liked: 113 times
Been liked: 57 times

Re: The few, the proud...

Post by Rem700 » Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:10 am

Didnt they make a movie about this in the 90's.......G.I. Jane ring a bell lol. White boxes and help for obsticals? SMH. I agree with Racer. If your going to be in it expect to meet the same physical standards as then men. if you cant GTFO.

User avatar
Nolan
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 2178
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:50 pm
Location: INDIANA
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: The few, the proud...

Post by Nolan » Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:58 am

always been a sore spot with me--standard should be the same for all making same pay, in same job, with same benefits, but that is my opinion.
"To disarm the people... was the best and most effectual way to enslave them."

-- George Mason, speech of June 14, 1788


Image

User avatar
justang1997
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 3169
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:59 pm
Location: Vine Grove
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: The few, the proud...

Post by justang1997 » Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:29 pm

Women shouldn't be in the army or marines period. I would only allow women in non combat roles in the air force and navy. There are plenty of excellent female military veterans out there but it's been my experience that that is the exception and not the norm.

Again, just to clarify, I'm sure there are plenty of tough female soldiers and marines out there that can even run faster than me and do more pushups and even kick my ass, and out shoot me but that is the exception and not the norm.

Sent from my Q10 using Tapatalk 2
Image

User avatar
Toddstang
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 14003
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:52 pm
Location: In A Van, Down by the river.
Has liked: 148 times
Been liked: 103 times

Re: The few, the proud...

Post by Toddstang » Fri Jan 03, 2014 2:18 pm

Nolan wrote:always been a sore spot with me--standard should be the same for all making same pay, in same job, with same benefits, but that is my opinion.
This.

User avatar
Toddinlou
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 1265
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:30 pm
Location: Audubon Park
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: The few, the proud...

Post by Toddinlou » Fri Jan 03, 2014 3:29 pm

There's some crazy ass brutes that happen to be born female. If they want to serve and meet the same basic standards then so be it. Reasonable accommodations can be made but if you can't do a pull up then maybe combat isn't the best role for you
Image

Rem700
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 13354
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 am
Location: Definitely at my soul crushing job!
Has liked: 113 times
Been liked: 57 times

Re: The few, the proud...

Post by Rem700 » Fri Jan 03, 2014 3:33 pm

Coach wrote:If they are going to be in combat they should be eligible for selective setvice. Its BS a man can and will be diened federal services (student loans ) that are paid for by tax money and a woman cannot.
That is a very good point that i had never thought of before. Equal is equal right?

User avatar
son of liberty
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 1759
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:22 pm
Location: Carrollton
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: The few, the proud...

Post by son of liberty » Fri Jan 03, 2014 3:57 pm

I doubt my wife could do as many pull ups as me, but I bet she could out run me. It a hard subject IMO, I mean we are saying that a system set up to make sure males are in shape , is the same system we use to make sure females are in shape. I dont know, I have never been a war fighter, but I would guess that its more about marksmanship , and ability to reason in a high pressure situation then it is about how many pull ups she can do. It would be interesting to see how many pull up some of the women that run the Iron man could do. I do know this, while not as physically strong , my wife works just as hard and gets just as much done as I do when we are say cutting fire wood, gardening, digging fence post. Historically from the Vikings , Russians , French resistance , women have provided much help in combat.
I think (Again not a war fighter) that physical test better mirroring what they actually do would be better suited to evaluating the ability of a given person to preform that task, not there ability to lift a heavy item above there head. Motivation and drive can often over come weaknesses in other areas. I have worked with women who I would have before men, and I have worked with men who were less help then princess, in every case it came down to there work ethic and drive more so then there physical strength.

Interesting anyway you look at it.
Image

User avatar
WLJ
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 30880
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
Location: Epsilon Eridani System
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 110 times

Re: The few, the proud...

Post by WLJ » Fri Jan 03, 2014 4:04 pm

The enemy will counter women solders with mouse firing catapults.


:llama:
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.

User avatar
Frailer
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 2676
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:46 pm
Location: Meade County
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: The few, the proud...

Post by Frailer » Fri Jan 03, 2014 6:56 pm

son of liberty wrote:I doubt my wife could do as many pull ups as me, but I bet she could out run me. It a hard subject IMO, I mean we are saying that a system set up to make sure males are in shape , is the same system we use to make sure females are in shape. I dont know, I have never been a war fighter, but I would guess that its more about marksmanship , and ability to reason in a high pressure situation then it is about how many pull ups she can do. It would be interesting to see how many pull up some of the women that run the Iron man could do. I do know this, while not as physically strong , my wife works just as hard and gets just as much done as I do when we are say cutting fire wood, gardening, digging fence post. Historically from the Vikings , Russians , French resistance , women have provided much help in combat.
I think (Again not a war fighter) that physical test better mirroring what they actually do would be better suited to evaluating the ability of a given person to preform that task, not there ability to lift a heavy item above there head. Motivation and drive can often over come weaknesses in other areas. I have worked with women who I would have before men, and I have worked with men who were less help then princess, in every case it came down to there work ethic and drive more so then there physical strength.

Interesting anyway you look at it.
Good post. The challenge has always been what constitutes "combat fitness." None of the services' fitness tests do a good job of assessing suitability for a particular job. Ideally, the PT test would be different for an admin clerk than for a cannon crewman...but it isn't. As such, we take a rough measure of overall fitness, normalized for age and gender.

Standards *should* be the same for everyone in a particular job, but we're not smart enough to figure out how to do that.

I'll go on record--as a former infantryman--that I don't think women belong in combat specialties, but my opinion is based more on the inability of men to deal with it than it is on the shortcomings of the female gender.

As an aside, one of the best soldiers who ever worked for me was a female. I fought (and won) to get her assigned as our cav squadron's intel officer (in violation of the law) during an OIF deployment because it was the right thing to do, as there was no doubt she was the best qualified candidate. Unfortunately, she was murdered in Afghanistan by an ANA traitor a few months ago.

Return to “Everything Else”

×