Kentucky Armory Club

rustynuts wrote:

WLJ wrote:I guess some of the gangs didn't get the memo.

At Least Two Shot Dead During Baltimore’s ‘Nobody Kill Anybody’ Weekend
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... y-weekend/

How sad is it that a city even needs to have an event like that?

ssracer wrote:This is going to be the biggest generation of fucking pussies. There will be people crawling under their desks crying because their boss told them they need to work over to finish up a job.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

WLJ wrote:I thought the other guy, the one from Chicago was suppose to be you know who. Guess I was wrong, it was HRC all along.

Unreal: Clinton's Pastor Compared Her 2016 Election Loss to Jesus's Death
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarko ... h-n2367442

PDM wrote:

WLJ wrote:I thought the other guy, the one from Chicago was suppose to be you know who. Guess I was wrong, it was HRC all along.

Unreal: Clinton's Pastor Compared Her 2016 Election Loss to Jesus's Death
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarko ... h-n2367442

Too bad it wasn't more similar

bigelowe wrote:Just go ahead and OC

George Washington was a slave owner, and we need to call slave owners out for what they are, whether we think they were protecting American freedom or not," Rye said. "He wasn't protecting my freedom. My ancestors weren't deemed human beings to him."
"So to me, I don't care if it's a George Washington statue or a Thomas Jefferson statue or a Robert E. Lee statue. They all need to come down," Rye said.
Rye added that Americans need to teach other about these figures "so we do not repeat [history], because we are very close to repeating it right now."
[…]
"Yeah, Angela, you've got a problem here," Avlon interjected.
"I'm not finished, John," Rye said.
"You're feeding into Steve Bannon and Trump's talking points," Avlon continued.
"No, no, no. But I'm not, but I'm not, but I'm not, John," Rye said, speaking over Avlon.
"And I'm gonna finish my point," she said. "I'm not feeding into white supremacy; I'm calling out white supremacy for what it is. And sometimes what it is, John, are blind spots. Sometimes what it is, is not acknowledging that this country was built upon a very violent past that resulted in death, and the raping, and the killing of my ancestors."
Rye said she was not going to make a distinction between George Washington and Robert E. Lee.
"So I'm not going to allow us to say it's OK for a Robert E. Lee but not a George Washington [statue]," Rye said. "We need to call it what it is."
"But I'm not giving any deference to George Washington or Robert E. Lee," she added.

WLJ wrote:And the stupid just won't stop

Read that Wolf Blitzer was speculating if the terror attack in Spain was a copycat of what happened in Charlottesville which of course was Trump's fault.

ssracer wrote:

WLJ wrote:And the stupid just won't stop

Read that Wolf Blitzer was speculating if the terror attack in Spain was a copycat of what happened in Charlottesville which of course was Trump's fault.

Yeah, I saw that. He must have been asleep for the past year as Islamic terrorists used that same method of attack over and over in Europe


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Like the NRA with the Second Amendment, the ACLU exploits the anachronistic nature of the First Amendment, it cedes to its of lack of foresight, and it demurs to the primacy of white men in the constitution’s considerations: The framers did not foresee a world in which white men alone would have power or opportunity for speech. Like the NRA, it parrots sympathy for the victims of so called “hate speech” but this is all performative double speak: a ventriloquist chiding his dummy. It condemns violence and then lawsuit by lawsuit ensures that the perpetrators have open door access to carry out that violence. It sues cities who try to keep the Klan off its streets throwing “peaceable assembly” in their faces. Let this be the last day that we put “peaceable” and “KKK” in the same sentence. There is no such thing. It is a stars and bars unicorn. …
I donate to the ACLU because I believe its work to protect immigrants is vital. I don’t know if i will continue. Why would I give an organization money which facilitates terror? No amount of constitutional rectitude can make this right. The organization must acknowledge that we are living in 21st century America, one that looks more and more like speculative fiction with cataclysmic urgencies borne of a nation that has yet to square its reality with its constitutional myths.
Lee Rowland, free speech attorney for the ACLU has said “It is important to defend speech we hate because that means the First Amendment rises to the tide of us all.” Ms. Rowland, will the ACLU continue to hide behind milquetoast notions of “offense from hate speech” and persist in what seems to be an organizational project of defending speech that intimidates, that terrorizes?

WLJ wrote:My head hurts

Like the NRA with the Second Amendment, the ACLU exploits the anachronistic nature of the First Amendment, it cedes to its of lack of foresight, and it demurs to the primacy of white men in the constitution’s considerations: The framers did not foresee a world in which white men alone would have power or opportunity for speech. Like the NRA, it parrots sympathy for the victims of so called “hate speech” but this is all performative double speak: a ventriloquist chiding his dummy. It condemns violence and then lawsuit by lawsuit ensures that the perpetrators have open door access to carry out that violence. It sues cities who try to keep the Klan off its streets throwing “peaceable assembly” in their faces. Let this be the last day that we put “peaceable” and “KKK” in the same sentence. There is no such thing. It is a stars and bars unicorn. …
I donate to the ACLU because I believe its work to protect immigrants is vital. I don’t know if i will continue. Why would I give an organization money which facilitates terror? No amount of constitutional rectitude can make this right. The organization must acknowledge that we are living in 21st century America, one that looks more and more like speculative fiction with cataclysmic urgencies borne of a nation that has yet to square its reality with its constitutional myths.
Lee Rowland, free speech attorney for the ACLU has said “It is important to defend speech we hate because that means the First Amendment rises to the tide of us all.” Ms. Rowland, will the ACLU continue to hide behind milquetoast notions of “offense from hate speech” and persist in what seems to be an organizational project of defending speech that intimidates, that terrorizes?

Actress: ACLU “the NRA of free speech”
http://hotair.com/archives/2017/08/17/a ... ee-speech/