Page 4 of 45

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:10 pm
by WLJ
Reginald Thomas never met a gun control law he didn't like

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:28 am
by WLJ
California Passes Prop 63: Background Checks for Ammo Sales, Mag Ban, Mandatory Stolen Gun Reporting
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2016/1 ... reporting/

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:45 am
by PDM
WLJ wrote:California Passes Prop 63: Background Checks for Ammo Sales, Mag Ban, Mandatory Stolen Gun Reporting
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2016/1 ... reporting/
I hated to see that. The good guys in Ca gave up and didn't vote

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 11:30 am
by WLJ
Universal Background Checks Fail in Maine, Pass in Nevada
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2016/1 ... ss-nevada/

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Fri May 12, 2017 8:52 pm
by WLJ
At least a ten pound pull. :roll:

NY Democrats Introduce Mandatory Trigger Pull Weight Bill
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/0 ... ight-bill/

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Fri May 12, 2017 9:39 pm
by Toddstang
NY Democrats are the reason abortions should be legal.

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 8:29 am
by WLJ
Try this one on for size
Specifically, the Handgun Trigger Safety Act would:

Authorize grants to develop and improve “personalized” handgun technology to increase efficacy and decrease costs;

Mandate that within five years of enactment all newly manufactured handguns must be personalized, ensuring that they can only be operated by authorized users;

Mandate that within ten years of enactment anyone selling a handgun must retrofit it with personalization technology before that sale can be completed; and

Provide reimbursement to manufacturers for the costs of retrofitting handguns through the Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund.
Rep. Maloney Introduces Legislation to Reduce Gun Deaths, Make Guns Safer
https://maloney.house.gov/media-center/ ... guns-safer

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 3:36 pm
by WLJ
BREAKING: Illinois Gun Dealer Licensing Bill Advances Out of House Committee
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/0 ... committee/

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 12:14 am
by WLJ
Not going anywhere but they're trying

H.R.3458 - To require certain semiautomatic pistols manufactured, imported, or sold by Federal firearms licensees to be capable of microstamping ammunition, and the prohibit the removal, obliteration, or alteration of the microstamped code or microstamping capability of a firearm.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-con ... cosponsors

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 6:14 am
by PDM
That'll make it about as far as Kim's ICBM

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2017 9:36 am
by WLJ
Massachusetts: Gun Control Bill Hits Governor Baker’s Desk
https://www.nraila.org/articles/2017110 ... akers-desk
Today, the Massachusetts state House of Representatives and Senate approved the conference committee report reconciling differences between the appropriations bills that contained gun control language banning bump fire stocks and trigger cranks.  This piece of legislation, House Bill 4008, will now go to Governor Charlie Baker’s desk for approval. It is important that Governor Baker line item veto the gun measure out of the HB 4008.  Please contact Governor Baker and urge him to line item veto the gun measure provision out of HB 4008! Click the “Take Action” button below to contact them.  

Under this provision, a “Bump Stock” is defined as a device for a semiautomatic firearm that increases the rate of fire achievable with such firearm by using energy from the recoil of the firearm to generate a reciprocating action that facilitates repeated activation of the trigger.  A “Trigger Crank” is defined as any device to be attached to a semi-automatic firearm that repeatedly activates the trigger of the firearm through the use of a lever or other part that is turned in a circular motion, but does not include any firearm initially designed and manufactured to fire through the use of a crank or lever.

The provision allows for the excessive punishment of life imprisonment, but with a minimum sentence of 18 months, for the mere possession of these accessories.

Currently, at the urging of Congress, ATF is reviewing whether its prior determinations regarding bump-fire stocks are correct.  Any legislation in this area should wait for this review to be complete so an accurate assessment of the applicable federal law is available.

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 4:47 pm
by WLJ
They're coming for your evil bayonet lugs

BREAKING: Democrats Introduce Assault Weapons Ban Bill in Congress. Again.
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/1 ... -congress/

Image

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 5:12 pm
by kokopelli
I'm positive that the church shooter would not have been able to shoot so much if the AR didn't have that bayonet lug or a flash hider...because of, you know- facts.

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:07 am
by WLJ
You can have medical marijuana now but you have to forfeit your rights.
KITV reports that Honolulu police are doing this via letters to cardholders demanding they “surrender weapons, permits, and ammunition to HPD or to transfer ownership.”

On November 28 The Honolulu Star reported that police have been sending letters throughout the year and the one dated November 13 was signed by HPD chief Susan Ballard. It says, “Your medical marijuana use disqualifies you from ownership of firearms and ammunition.”
On August 31, 2016, Breitbart News reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a ban on gun ownership for medical marijuana users is constitutional. The decision was based on the fact that marijuana use remains illegal on the federal level, whether state-sanctioned or not. This means medical marijuana cardholders cannot pass background check form 4473 and, therefore, cannot legally purchase a firearm.
Honolulu Police Order Medical Marijuana Cardholders to Surrender Their Firearms
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... -firearms/

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:19 am
by Rem700
WLJ wrote:You can have medical marijuana now but you have to forfeit your rights.
KITV reports that Honolulu police are doing this via letters to cardholders demanding they “surrender weapons, permits, and ammunition to HPD or to transfer ownership.”

On November 28 The Honolulu Star reported that police have been sending letters throughout the year and the one dated November 13 was signed by HPD chief Susan Ballard. It says, “Your medical marijuana use disqualifies you from ownership of firearms and ammunition.”
On August 31, 2016, Breitbart News reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a ban on gun ownership for medical marijuana users is constitutional. The decision was based on the fact that marijuana use remains illegal on the federal level, whether state-sanctioned or not. This means medical marijuana cardholders cannot pass background check form 4473 and, therefore, cannot legally purchase a firearm.
Honolulu Police Order Medical Marijuana Cardholders to Surrender Their Firearms
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... -firearms/

Honestly this makes sense. Pot is illegal federally so you would be lying on the 4473 form if you mark no to that question. I dont agree it should be illegal federally but at present time it is. Now at the same time the state is violating the fed law by making pot legal, so im not sure what grounds they have to enfore the firearms rules (not law) above. Also if you already own the gun then your not violating the 4473 question and so this seems stupid. My head hurts.

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:23 am
by WLJ
Rem700 wrote:
WLJ wrote:You can have medical marijuana now but you have to forfeit your rights.
KITV reports that Honolulu police are doing this via letters to cardholders demanding they “surrender weapons, permits, and ammunition to HPD or to transfer ownership.”

On November 28 The Honolulu Star reported that police have been sending letters throughout the year and the one dated November 13 was signed by HPD chief Susan Ballard. It says, “Your medical marijuana use disqualifies you from ownership of firearms and ammunition.”
On August 31, 2016, Breitbart News reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a ban on gun ownership for medical marijuana users is constitutional. The decision was based on the fact that marijuana use remains illegal on the federal level, whether state-sanctioned or not. This means medical marijuana cardholders cannot pass background check form 4473 and, therefore, cannot legally purchase a firearm.
Honolulu Police Order Medical Marijuana Cardholders to Surrender Their Firearms
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... -firearms/

Honestly this makes sense. Pot is illegal federally so you would be lying on the 4473 form if you mark no to that question. I dont agree it should be illegal federally but at present time it is. Now at the same time the state is violating the fed law by making pot legal, so im not sure what grounds they have to enfore the firearms rules (not law) above. Also if you already own the gun then your not violating the 4473 question and so this seems stupid. My head hurts.
It's a legal quagmire

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:32 am
by Rem700
WLJ wrote:
Rem700 wrote:
WLJ wrote:You can have medical marijuana now but you have to forfeit your rights.
KITV reports that Honolulu police are doing this via letters to cardholders demanding they “surrender weapons, permits, and ammunition to HPD or to transfer ownership.”

On November 28 The Honolulu Star reported that police have been sending letters throughout the year and the one dated November 13 was signed by HPD chief Susan Ballard. It says, “Your medical marijuana use disqualifies you from ownership of firearms and ammunition.”
On August 31, 2016, Breitbart News reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a ban on gun ownership for medical marijuana users is constitutional. The decision was based on the fact that marijuana use remains illegal on the federal level, whether state-sanctioned or not. This means medical marijuana cardholders cannot pass background check form 4473 and, therefore, cannot legally purchase a firearm.
Honolulu Police Order Medical Marijuana Cardholders to Surrender Their Firearms
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... -firearms/

Honestly this makes sense. Pot is illegal federally so you would be lying on the 4473 form if you mark no to that question. I dont agree it should be illegal federally but at present time it is. Now at the same time the state is violating the fed law by making pot legal, so im not sure what grounds they have to enfore the firearms rules (not law) above. Also if you already own the gun then your not violating the 4473 question and so this seems stupid. My head hurts.
It's a legal quagmire
"They" are good at creating those :lol:

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 11:50 am
by WLJ
In other words, it's "pick and choose" what laws are adhered to based on how we feel.

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:41 pm
by rustynuts
It's all about the feelz.

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2017 11:06 am
by WLJ
I'm sure Fischer is taking notes.
The City of Columbia passed an ordinance Tuesday that bans the use of bump stocks and trigger cranks.

Columbia?s ordinance, which was introduced at the Dec. 5 City Council meeting, makes it illegal to attach bump stocks or trigger cranks to any guns within the city, except by military or law enforcement personnel. It would still be legal to own those devices, so long as they are stored in separate containers from firearms.
Never mind that the discharge of rifles is already illegal within city limits this makes them "FEEL" like they're doing something.

Columbia, SC Becomes First City to Ban Use of Bump Fire Stocks
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/1 ... re-stocks/

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 8:58 pm
by WLJ
And more bump stock news
Note: In the comments in the link below some are saying the doc was pulled. Not sure what that means yet.
Tomorrow, ATF will publish an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemakingregarding the application of the definition of machinegun to “Bump Fire” stocks and other similar devices. As many have feared, it appears that the regulatory agency is soliciting feedback as to whether bump fire stocks, binary triggers, etc., fit within the definition of machinegun.

Comments are due thirty (30) days from the date of publication in the Federal Register. Assuming that nothing goes awry with the publication tomorrow, that would mean any comment you wish to submit in opposition to this advance notice would need to be submitted by 11:59 PM on Sunday, January 21, 2018. While one might expect an extra day to be provided to place the deadline on a Monday, agency rules govern. ATF confirmed via telephone that the deadline was Sunday.
ATF Signals They Intend to Regulate Bump Fire Stocks Like Machine Guns
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/1 ... hine-guns/

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 10:10 pm
by Toddstang
Bump fire stocks have been used in how many gun related crimes?
How long before semiauto's get the chop?

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 10:16 pm
by ssracer
The NRA asked for it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 10:17 pm
by ssracer
Toddstang wrote:Bump fire stocks have been used in how many gun related crimes?
How long before semiauto's get the chop?
I just love the fact that before Vegas 95% of the population had never even heard of a bump stock. And most of them still don’t know that you don’t need a stock to bump fire.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Re: Gun Control Watch

Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2017 11:42 pm
by Toddstang
Just wait till they hear about "Speed Loaders!"