Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
I found some tavors on a website. I think this is just people panicking with no real basis..
But im half tempted to buy this tavor. Ahould I? I think this white house thing is overblwon. If anything itll just be exec order with expanded background check, not AWB.
I want to buy ammo right now. Not a 1600 tavor
But im half tempted to buy this tavor. Ahould I? I think this white house thing is overblwon. If anything itll just be exec order with expanded background check, not AWB.
I want to buy ammo right now. Not a 1600 tavor
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
That calculator is depressing. I want to move back to pnw and id need an increase anywhere from 30 to 50% to maintain my standard of living. WTF.Dave1965 wrote:Bama wrote:Dave1965 wrote: Wife said they said that the FBI stated that these people had to have help affording all the stuff they had, it was worth 30K. I said yeah they probably think a thousand rounds of ammo costs $5000 by FBI standards
Article said they guy made 70K a year. 3,000 rounds of ammo could be very affordable at that salary.
What I could buy with 70k a year....
Cost of living there compared to Corbin KY is about 20% different (thought you lived in corbin)
http://www.areavibes.com/cost-of-living ... orbin,+ky/
apt rent in corbin is 742 and out there is 1988
home insurance is 850 in corbin and 2700 in SB, CA
making 55k in corbin is equal to 70k out there.
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
I have a Tavor, its mehTomahawk wrote:I found some tavors on a website. I think this is just people panicking with no real basis..
But im half tempted to buy this tavor. Ahould I? I think this white house thing is overblwon. If anything itll just be exec order with expanded background check, not AWB.
I want to buy ammo right now. Not a 1600 tavor
- WLJ
- KAC Member
- Posts: 30881
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
- Location: Epsilon Eridani System
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
In the last big ban bill they tried to pass after Sandy Hook the selling of Tavors were to be banned by name, not features like on ARs. Something to think about.Tomahawk wrote:I found some tavors on a website. I think this is just people panicking with no real basis..
But im half tempted to buy this tavor. Ahould I? I think this white house thing is overblwon. If anything itll just be exec order with expanded background check, not AWB.
I want to buy ammo right now. Not a 1600 tavor
All guns are meh when you can't find the ones in your own house..Dave1965 wrote: I have a Tavor, its meh
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.
- WLJ
- KAC Member
- Posts: 30881
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
- Location: Epsilon Eridani System
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
Atlantic firearms have them in right now.Tomahawk wrote:I found some tavors on a website. I think this is just people panicking with no real basis..
But im half tempted to buy this tavor. Ahould I? I think this white house thing is overblwon. If anything itll just be exec order with expanded background check, not AWB.
I want to buy ammo right now. Not a 1600 tavor
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.
- gaston_kalash
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2013 11:09 pm
- Location: somerset
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
http://youtu.be/oePCncK77i0
This is why we when against the left.
This is why we when against the left.
SI JE PUIS
-
- Global Mod
- Posts: 12053
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:50 pm
- Location: Louisville
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 22 times
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
That was my take.Dave1965 wrote:I have a Tavor, its mehTomahawk wrote:I found some tavors on a website. I think this is just people panicking with no real basis..
But im half tempted to buy this tavor. Ahould I? I think this white house thing is overblwon. If anything itll just be exec order with expanded background check, not AWB.
I want to buy ammo right now. Not a 1600 tavor
- WLJ
- KAC Member
- Posts: 30881
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
- Location: Epsilon Eridani System
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
Apple CEO vows to resist court order to hack iPhone of San Bernardino terrorist
http://www.wdrb.com/story/31240185/appl ... -terrorist
http://www.wdrb.com/story/31240185/appl ... -terrorist
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.
-
- Global Mod
- Posts: 12053
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:50 pm
- Location: Louisville
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 22 times
- Frailer
- KAC Member
- Posts: 2676
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:46 pm
- Location: Meade County
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
Good on Apple.WLJ wrote:Apple CEO vows to resist court order to hack iPhone of San Bernardino terrorist
http://www.wdrb.com/story/31240185/appl ... -terrorist
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 13354
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 am
- Location: Definitely at my soul crushing job!
- Has liked: 113 times
- Been liked: 57 times
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
Yes and no. Private citizen not yet convicted of a crime...yes, known murderer/terrorist whom has killed US citizens....hell noFrailer wrote:Good on Apple.WLJ wrote:Apple CEO vows to resist court order to hack iPhone of San Bernardino terrorist
http://www.wdrb.com/story/31240185/appl ... -terrorist
- ssracer
- KAC Member
- Posts: 13804
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:24 pm
- Location: KY
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 61 times
- Contact:
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
The ruling by Pym, a former federal prosecutor, requires Apple to supply software the FBI can load onto Farook's county-owned work iPhone to bypass a self-destruct feature that erases the phone's data after too many unsuccessful attempts to unlock it. The FBI wants to be able to try different combinations in rapid sequence until it finds the right one.Rem700 wrote:Yes and no. Private citizen not yet convicted of a crime...yes, known murderer/terrorist whom has killed US citizens....hell noFrailer wrote:Good on Apple.WLJ wrote:Apple CEO vows to resist court order to hack iPhone of San Bernardino terrorist
http://www.wdrb.com/story/31240185/appl ... -terrorist
You give something like that to the FBI and think they'll only use it on this one phone?
- Frailer
- KAC Member
- Posts: 2676
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:46 pm
- Location: Meade County
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
But all they want to do is stop terrorists! It could save lives! Think of the children!ssracer wrote:The ruling by Pym, a former federal prosecutor, requires Apple to supply software the FBI can load onto Farook's county-owned work iPhone to bypass a self-destruct feature that erases the phone's data after too many unsuccessful attempts to unlock it. The FBI wants to be able to try different combinations in rapid sequence until it finds the right one.Rem700 wrote:Yes and no. Private citizen not yet convicted of a crime...yes, known murderer/terrorist whom has killed US citizens....hell noFrailer wrote:Good on Apple.WLJ wrote:Apple CEO vows to resist court order to hack iPhone of San Bernardino terrorist
http://www.wdrb.com/story/31240185/appl ... -terrorist
You give something like that to the FBI and think they'll only use it on this one phone?
I *HATE* the "t-word."
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 13354
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 am
- Location: Definitely at my soul crushing job!
- Has liked: 113 times
- Been liked: 57 times
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
Very good point. I did not know it was anything like that. I figured Apple...being the one who designed the software, had a back door into the locked phone and is refusing to use it for privacy issues.ssracer wrote:The ruling by Pym, a former federal prosecutor, requires Apple to supply software the FBI can load onto Farook's county-owned work iPhone to bypass a self-destruct feature that erases the phone's data after too many unsuccessful attempts to unlock it. The FBI wants to be able to try different combinations in rapid sequence until it finds the right one.Rem700 wrote:Yes and no. Private citizen not yet convicted of a crime...yes, known murderer/terrorist whom has killed US citizens....hell noFrailer wrote:Good on Apple.WLJ wrote:Apple CEO vows to resist court order to hack iPhone of San Bernardino terrorist
http://www.wdrb.com/story/31240185/appl ... -terrorist
You give something like that to the FBI and think they'll only use it on this one phone?
- WLJ
- KAC Member
- Posts: 30881
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
- Location: Epsilon Eridani System
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
I find it hard to believe Apple didn't leave themselves a backdoor. I also wonder if the Chinese slipped one in considering the fact it was probably made in a Chinese factory.Rem700 wrote:Very good point. I did not know it was anything like that. I figured Apple...being the one who designed the software, had a back door into the locked phone and is refusing to use it for privacy issues.ssracer wrote:The ruling by Pym, a former federal prosecutor, requires Apple to supply software the FBI can load onto Farook's county-owned work iPhone to bypass a self-destruct feature that erases the phone's data after too many unsuccessful attempts to unlock it. The FBI wants to be able to try different combinations in rapid sequence until it finds the right one.Rem700 wrote:Yes and no. Private citizen not yet convicted of a crime...yes, known murderer/terrorist whom has killed US citizens....hell noFrailer wrote:Good on Apple.WLJ wrote:Apple CEO vows to resist court order to hack iPhone of San Bernardino terrorist
http://www.wdrb.com/story/31240185/appl ... -terrorist
You give something like that to the FBI and think they'll only use it on this one phone?
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.
- richief
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:38 pm
- Location: S.E. KY's Apple-Latcha Mts
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
Pretty sure apple could just take the thing apart and access the memory, the alphabet agencies would prob like a master key though, that's what I think they are fishing for.
- ssracer
- KAC Member
- Posts: 13804
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:24 pm
- Location: KY
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 61 times
- Contact:
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
leaving yourself a back boor is just leaving every hacker a back doorWLJ wrote:I find it hard to believe Apple didn't leave themselves a backdoor. I also wonder if the Chinese slipped one in considering the fact it was probably made in a Chinese factory.Rem700 wrote:Very good point. I did not know it was anything like that. I figured Apple...being the one who designed the software, had a back door into the locked phone and is refusing to use it for privacy issues.ssracer wrote:The ruling by Pym, a former federal prosecutor, requires Apple to supply software the FBI can load onto Farook's county-owned work iPhone to bypass a self-destruct feature that erases the phone's data after too many unsuccessful attempts to unlock it. The FBI wants to be able to try different combinations in rapid sequence until it finds the right one.Rem700 wrote:Yes and no. Private citizen not yet convicted of a crime...yes, known murderer/terrorist whom has killed US citizens....hell noFrailer wrote:Good on Apple.WLJ wrote:Apple CEO vows to resist court order to hack iPhone of San Bernardino terrorist
http://www.wdrb.com/story/31240185/appl ... -terrorist
You give something like that to the FBI and think they'll only use it on this one phone?
- WLJ
- KAC Member
- Posts: 30881
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
- Location: Epsilon Eridani System
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
Even if you hardware access the memory directly without the proper encryption key the data you will be extracting is meaningless. Modern encryption is pretty darn difficult to crack even with the newest computers. A brute force crack could takes decades or more.richief wrote:Pretty sure apple could just take the thing apart and access the memory, the alphabet agencies would prob like a master key though, that's what I think they are fishing for.
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.
- WLJ
- KAC Member
- Posts: 30881
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
- Location: Epsilon Eridani System
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
Sometimes yes, sometime no. There are sneaky ways of doing it.ssracer wrote:leaving yourself a back boor is just leaving every hacker a back doorWLJ wrote:I find it hard to believe Apple didn't leave themselves a backdoor. I also wonder if the Chinese slipped one in considering the fact it was probably made in a Chinese factory.Rem700 wrote:Very good point. I did not know it was anything like that. I figured Apple...being the one who designed the software, had a back door into the locked phone and is refusing to use it for privacy issues.ssracer wrote:The ruling by Pym, a former federal prosecutor, requires Apple to supply software the FBI can load onto Farook's county-owned work iPhone to bypass a self-destruct feature that erases the phone's data after too many unsuccessful attempts to unlock it. The FBI wants to be able to try different combinations in rapid sequence until it finds the right one.Rem700 wrote:Yes and no. Private citizen not yet convicted of a crime...yes, known murderer/terrorist whom has killed US citizens....hell noFrailer wrote:Good on Apple.WLJ wrote:Apple CEO vows to resist court order to hack iPhone of San Bernardino terrorist
http://www.wdrb.com/story/31240185/appl ... -terrorist
You give something like that to the FBI and think they'll only use it on this one phone?
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.
- WLJ
- KAC Member
- Posts: 30881
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:55 pm
- Location: Epsilon Eridani System
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
Heating up
DOJ files motion to compel Apple to comply in San Bernardino investigation
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/02/19/do ... tcmp=hpbt1
DOJ files motion to compel Apple to comply in San Bernardino investigation
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/02/19/do ... tcmp=hpbt1
There are criminals among us who are both homicidal and incorrigible. Their parents took a shot at civilizing them and failed. Their school teachers took a shot at them and failed. The odds are overwhelming that government welfare programs and penal institutions took a shot at them and failed. If it ever becomes your turn to take a shot at them, don’t fail.
- Toddstang
- Global Mod
- Posts: 14004
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:52 pm
- Location: In A Van, Down by the river.
- Has liked: 148 times
- Been liked: 103 times
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
You cant beat the Feds.WLJ wrote:Heating up
DOJ files motion to compel Apple to comply in San Bernardino investigation
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/02/19/do ... tcmp=hpbt1
Im sure Hussein Obama will create an EO that overrides any company secrets.
- RecoilSensitive
- KAC Member
- Posts: 3912
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:10 pm
- Location: Louisville
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 2 times
Re: Active shooter(s) in San Bernardino
Apple is one company that may be able to win. They have the $$$$ to spend. And simply say fuck you.
"But now," he said, "take your money and a traveler's bag. And if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one" -Jesus (Luke 22:36 NLT)