So what do you think about Rush's little slut comment?

Post by **WLJ** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:16 am

What do you think

Hang Rush, he shouldn't has said that?
Support Rush?
Much ado about nothing?
Damn straight she a slut, whats her number?

Sound off.

Post by **jackalo626** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:26 am

Shouldn't hav said it but like his views usually.

Post by **Rem700** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:47 am

bad comment on his part, but im usually in line with his views

Post by **justang1997** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 12:01 pm

1st A rights! Use 'em or loose 'em.

Post by **Toddinlou** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 12:32 pm

Birth Control = Good. Rush speaking his mind = Good. Conflicted statement.... Yes. It's not if a agree with his comment because I don't, but I do support his right to say it and anyone who doesn't like it can turn the channel.

Post by **Lio** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:11 pm

Rush was and still is an idiot regardless of this stupid comment he made.

http://www.youtube.com/user/ssracer02 · Post by **ssracer** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:35 pm

Seen a comment on an article on yahoo where a woman said that birth control should be covered because it is preventative for pregnancy which is a medical condition just like high blood pressure and diabetes. I had to comment back that pregnancy as a "medical condition" is 100% preventable with NO medication.

Post by **Next** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:41 pm

I thought it was funny. I don't mind the sponsors leaving maybe less commercials.

)

Post by **WLJ** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:43 pm

The way I view it, sex while blocking reproduction is basally a recreational activity when you come right down to it. So using their logic if I can be forced to cover their recreational activity then it's okay to force them to pay for mine. In other words, why can't people be forced to cover my ammo costs? Using their logic of course.

http://www.youtube.com/user/ssracer02 · Post by **ssracer** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:48 pm

Post by **Next** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:53 pm

Should call HR Block if we can deduct ammo?? Then buy stock in Aim surplus.

Post by **Frailer** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:05 pm

A and C.

Yes, Rush is a blowhard/clown, and I take some pleasure at the flak he's taking.

But it is much ado about nothing. He's free to call the woman a slut, and she's free to call him an idiot.

Post by **jackalo626** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:17 pm

Lio wrote:Rush was and still is an idiot regardless of this stupid comment he made.

nope he is a very smart businessman with millions of listeners who agree with him. Calling names is silly at his level and a dumb act but very much not an idiot. I am conservative but to each their own. BTW still looking for a car? I had a few that were in that price range but weren't the most reliable so I didn't go any further with them.

Post by **Ar-Rob** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:22 pm

WLJ wrote:The way I view it, sex while blocking reproduction is basally a recreational activity when you come right down to it. So using their logic if I can be forced to cover their recreational activity then it's okay to force them to pay for mine. In other words, why can't people be forced to cover my ammo costs? Using their logic of course.

don't let the .gov hear that,they will try to tax it

Post by **Ar-Rob** » Mon Mar 05, 2012 11:39 pm

probably so you shouldn't have to worry

Post by **Lio** » Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:20 am

Jackalo626 wrote: nope he is a very smart businessman with millions of listeners who agree with him. Calling names is silly at his level and a dumb act but very much not an idiot. I am conservative but to each their own. BTW still looking for a car? I had a few that were in that price range but weren't the most reliable so I didn't go any further with them.

That's true.

Thanks for the effort on the car; very much appreciated.

Post by **ChopperDoc** » Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:41 am

Lio wrote:Rush was and still is an idiot regardless of this stupid comment he made.

Your opinion. And that is fine.

Not sure how he is being condemned for calling them something that they like to identify themselves with.

http://slutwalknyc.com/

BMH · Post by **BMH** » Thu Mar 08, 2012 5:11 pm

It is his first amendment right to say what he did. It's also the same right for every who disagrees with it to condemn him for it. Personally, I think the part about wanting the "girls" to post sex videos was over the top even for him.

Post by **Lady Luck** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:26 pm

It was his opinion and he has a right to speak it.I however dont see the problem with bcontrol being covered under ins. Your paying for it anyway when the health departments and clinics are handing it out for free to young girls. If girls dont take birthcontrol your gonna be payin for them to take care of their babies later.
Unfortunantly thats just how it is now.

Post by **DDgunslinger** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:03 pm

It is what it is.... damn dirty sluts lmao j/k

.... but not really

Post by **Robert Paulson** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:13 pm

Radio guys do and say crazy things to make a main stream media splash. Howard sterns been doing it for years. I mean look we are talking about rush. When was the last time there was a thread about him on this or that other forum. So it worked.

BlackRifle · Post by **BlackRifle** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:25 pm

I support his right To say it, but he ceased being relevant a few years ago IMHO.

Post by **Geno** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 5:31 pm

The entire contraception "issue" to me seems a distraction to keep attention off of other larger issues. As far as Rush's remark, it is his opinion. I personally think he was using a debating technique, reducio ad absurdum. Use your opponent 's argument technique taken to an absurd length to show its faults. By her own admission she said that she spent over $2000.00 per year for contraception. If she isn't charging for it, at that level I tend to agree with Rush. In some cases I understand that wedding cake is less expensive!

Post by **Frailer** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:09 pm

Geno wrote:The entire contraception "issue" to me seems a distraction to keep attention off of other larger issues. As far as Rush's remark, it is his opinion. I personally think he was using a debating technique, reducio ad absurdum. Use your opponent 's argument technique taken to an absurd length to show its faults...

It's reductio ad absurdum. Used correctly it is a valid debate technique. But when used the way Rush did it's a logical fallacy.

If the girl's spending $2K a year for birth control she shouldn't share her sex videos; she should share that crack she's been smoking.

Post by **Geno** » Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:52 pm

That's what I get for posting from my phone with thick thumbs. Whether it is a fallacy would depend upon the person's complete argument, I was paraphrasing. Still the first amendment should stand in my way of thinking. Similiar to the things uttered by bill maher about women with whom he disagrees.

Kentucky Armory Club