Page 1 of 1
"Company targeting police, bounty hunters with safer ammo"
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:28 pm
by WLJ
A more advanced rubber bullet or a bunch of hot air?
Company targeting police, bounty hunters with safer ammo
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/01/co ... latestnews
"Company targeting police, bounty hunters with safer ammo"
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 1:47 pm
by ssracer
"Safe ammo" is an oxymoron if I've ever heard one
Re: "Company targeting police, bounty hunters with safer amm
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 6:38 pm
by Wyldman
Anything moving near 1000 fps can, and likely will be, lethal. "Less-lethal" is an accurate term, but the real question is "how much less-lethal"?
My last question would be: why would any of us even want "less-lethal" ammunition when the only time we can legally discharge (or even draw) our weapons would be in fear of our own or someone else's life. The very idea of our using "less-lethal" ammunition would be in the same class as "shoot to wound", a really bad idea.
I'm not a cop, nor a bounty hunter, so I can't speak to their motivatations or legalities.
Re: "Company targeting police, bounty hunters with safer amm
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 7:46 pm
by Mike
Carrying a .22 is sometimes considered "less lethal"