Legal discussion

Forum for concealed carry questions, classes, tips, and tricks.
User avatar
Mike
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 3118
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:33 pm
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 5 times

Re: Legal discussion

Post by Mike » Thu Jul 18, 2013 11:42 am

INTENT is a large part of a crime. If you report it it can show your intent for the crime. If you don't report it, it's anybody's guess to the intent(and a prosecutor can use whatever intent they feel you had).
:llama:

Rem700
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 13302
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 am
Location: Definitely at my soul crushing job!
Has liked: 110 times
Been liked: 56 times

Re: Legal discussion

Post by Rem700 » Thu Jul 18, 2013 11:47 am

Mike wrote:INTENT is a large part of a crime. If you report it it can show your intent for the crime. If you don't report it, it's anybody's guess to the intent(and a prosecutor can use whatever intent they feel you had).
Agreed, that was the main point i was trying to make in my previous post.

User avatar
ChopperDoc
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 5778
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:14 pm
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Legal discussion

Post by ChopperDoc » Thu Jul 18, 2013 12:03 pm

Yep, and in the stray bullet scenario, the intent they 'prove' could be the difference in jail time and not jail time. yes you did it, it was an accident, but you had no malicious or wanton intent to hurt that person. What charge you are convicted on could rely heavily on whether you called it in right away (regardless of legal requirement to do so or an absence of one) or whether you just drove off and waited on them to find you.
"You rarely rise to the occasion, you usually just sink to your lowest level of training."

User avatar
justang1997
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 3169
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:59 pm
Location: Vine Grove
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Legal discussion

Post by justang1997 » Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:21 pm

True but zimmerman was on the phone with 911 BEFORE it even happened and his intent was questioned.
Image

User avatar
justang1997
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 3169
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:59 pm
Location: Vine Grove
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Legal discussion

Post by justang1997 » Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:22 pm

If anything, I'd say Zimmerman's own 911 call did more harm for him than good.
Image

Rem700
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 13302
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 am
Location: Definitely at my soul crushing job!
Has liked: 110 times
Been liked: 56 times

Re: Legal discussion

Post by Rem700 » Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:42 pm

justang1997 wrote:True but zimmerman was on the phone with 911 BEFORE it even happened and his intent was questioned.
Not really. His intent was only questioned after higher ups pressed for charges. The first responding officers did not charge him. Zim hopefully is the exception due to political influence.

Rem700
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 13302
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 am
Location: Definitely at my soul crushing job!
Has liked: 110 times
Been liked: 56 times

Re: Legal discussion

Post by Rem700 » Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:43 pm

justang1997 wrote:If anything, I'd say Zimmerman's own 911 call did more harm for him than good.
If you read the blog that CD posted by M ayoob then you will see the 911 call actually helped him a bit as it proved he had done nothin illegal. He simply followed the instructions of the dispatcher

Rem700
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 13302
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 am
Location: Definitely at my soul crushing job!
Has liked: 110 times
Been liked: 56 times

Re: Legal discussion

Post by Rem700 » Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:45 pm

It helped prove his intent was simply to gather intel for the officers not to prevent or attack Martin.

User avatar
justang1997
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 3169
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:59 pm
Location: Vine Grove
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Legal discussion

Post by justang1997 » Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:46 pm

I was just now reading that blog. Looks like it did indeed help his case. Just not with the trial by media.
Image

Rem700
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 13302
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 am
Location: Definitely at my soul crushing job!
Has liked: 110 times
Been liked: 56 times

Re: Legal discussion

Post by Rem700 » Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:48 pm

justang1997 wrote:I was just now reading that blog. Looks like it did indeed help his case. Just not with the trial by media.
Exactly. The media fucks up everything they touch. IMO they are 90% of the reason this case ever made it to court.

User avatar
ChopperDoc
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 5778
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:14 pm
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Legal discussion

Post by ChopperDoc » Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:11 pm

Yep. just imagine how bad this could have been if Zimmerman had done exactly what he did but not call 911 until after? How would he prove that he was not stalking Martin or chase him and corner him?

They were able to easily establish the 4 minutes of time between Zimmerman losing sight of Martin and the attack. That alone was massively helpful in this case in determining who the initial aggressor was.

But that is not how your scenario plays out. In yours, there is no time for a pre-911 call, but I will again submit that in a majority of situations like that where deadly force is used, it will be far better to call it in yourself rather than wait until they find you.
"You rarely rise to the occasion, you usually just sink to your lowest level of training."

User avatar
justang1997
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 3169
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:59 pm
Location: Vine Grove
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: Legal discussion

Post by justang1997 » Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:59 pm

I agree. Sad that the way this trial happened causes hesitation. In my mind anyways. I'm sure I'm not the only one thinking this way.
Image

Rem700
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 13302
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 am
Location: Definitely at my soul crushing job!
Has liked: 110 times
Been liked: 56 times

Re: Legal discussion

Post by Rem700 » Thu Jul 18, 2013 3:12 pm

justang1997 wrote:I agree. Sad that the way this trial happened causes hesitation. In my mind anyways. I'm sure I'm not the only one thinking this way.
You got that right. This trial has shed negative light on being the good guy and its because of the medias portrayal of the "innocent child" and a "racist wanna be cop with a gun". SPIN SPIN SPIN until they are so dizzy they dont know which way is up.

User avatar
ChopperDoc
KAC Member
KAC Member
Posts: 5778
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:14 pm
Has liked: 0
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Legal discussion

Post by ChopperDoc » Thu Jul 18, 2013 3:23 pm

A suit has been filed already by the Florida employee who was fired after his testimony that the Prosecutor's office withheld info.

There are lawyers calling for Ms Corey (Special Prosecutor assigned when the other dude quit), one of them being DerShowItz (the militant leftist law teacher Alan Dershowitz), of all things.

Zimmerman is going to be under a microscope for a little while, but I think he is going to be fine and some folks who got this ball rolling on the kangaroo court are not going to make out as well as Zimmerman.

The media will not cover that, however.
"You rarely rise to the occasion, you usually just sink to your lowest level of training."

Return to “Concealed Carry”

×