Livewire wrote:I think I'm on episode six so far.
If I were a member of the jury Id have a really hard time convicting him.
In my mind there isn't enough evidence to say he's guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Agreed and i started the thread by stating that. I have also read many news articles (again hard to be credible sources because its the media) but so far i have not seen any evidence that directly links either of them to her death and i i see lots of instances where the circumstantial evidence found was done so by the very people he was suing at the time. Right or wrong, biased or not the one county police dept never should have been involved being it was direct conflict of interest to the pending law suit. To top that off they sent the 2 officers directly named in the suit to "help"....aka conduct a full search of his residence, then they lied to the public about all of it. That in it self probably should have been enough to toss the case and set him free guilty or not or at least move the trial somewhere else. Not to mention that 2 of the jurors were directly linked to the county Sherrifs dept (but probably hard to find someone who isnt in a small town rural county area and im sure his lawyers had the option to dismiss those jurors and chose not to). I know criminal cases get tossed all the time even when evidence is damning just because of a technicality. But what do i know, im no lawyer and i didnt stay at a Holiday Inn Express.Mike wrote:Livewire wrote:I think I'm on episode six so far.
If I were a member of the jury Id have a really hard time convicting him.
In my mind there isn't enough evidence to say he's guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt.
But if you were on the jury you would get the other mounds of evidence against him that this television show doesn't show you.
You guys do realize this is television right? It's for entertainment. You aren't getting the whole story, only the story the show wants you to see.
I agree...but there is too much conflicting interest in this case.Mike wrote:Livewire wrote:I think I'm on episode six so far.
If I were a member of the jury Id have a really hard time convicting him.
In my mind there isn't enough evidence to say he's guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt.
But if you were on the jury you would get the other mounds of evidence against him that this television show doesn't show you.
You guys do realize this is television right? It's for entertainment. You aren't getting the whole story, only the story the show wants you to see.
