Page 8 of 8

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2017 1:00 pm
by ssracer
I’m sure she asked him all the hard hitting questions...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2017 11:57 am
by WLJ
Looks like any and all proposed bump-fire legislation is DOA except maybe on the state level in certain states.

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2017 11:59 am
by rustynuts
It's not headline news any more so.no.one cares.

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:00 pm
by WLJ
Wonder how those who paid $1k+ for one are feeling right now?

Slide Fire to Resume Sales of Some Bump Fire Stocks Beginning Tomorrow
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/1 ... -tomorrow/

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 10:32 am
by WLJ
Lawyers, sucking the life out of everything but their bank account.
Now they're suing the concert promoter
Defendants in the new lawsuits also include Live Nation Entertainment, the concert promoter. In a statement, the Beverly Hills, California-based company expressed sorrow for "countless people forever impacted by this senseless act of violence" and said it was cooperating with an active FBI investigation. It declined to comment about the lawsuits.
Las Vegas shooting: Attorneys file lawsuits on behalf of more than 450 victims
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/21/la ... ctims.html

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 11:39 am
by ssracer
Right...because it’s the concert promoter’s fault some asshole went crazy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 1:57 pm
by Rem700
ssracer wrote:Right...because it’s the concert promoter’s fault some asshole went crazy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Lawyers following the money.

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:14 pm
by ssracer
There’s still so much unanswered shady shit from this event it makes my head hurt


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:09 pm
by Niceguy
ssracer wrote:There’s still so much unanswered shady shit from this event it makes my head hurt


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Absolutely!

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 9:16 am
by WLJ
Guy starts shooting from the eight floor of a high rise condo building and it turns out the Vegas shooter owned a unit there. Probably just a crazy copycat but still a bit bizarre and I'm sure going to add to the tin-foil-hatterness

Vegas gunman owned unit at Reno shooting site, report says
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/11/29/ve ... -says.html

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 7:15 pm
by WLJ
Breaking: Police Arrest Las Vegas Spree Killer’s Ammo Supplier for “Armor Piercing” Ammunition
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/0 ... mmunition/


APNewsBreak: Man who sold ammo to Vegas shooter charged
https://apnews.com/58e9557074dc4274887d ... _medium=AP
An Arizona man who sold ammunition to the gunman in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history has been charged with manufacturing armor-piercing bullets.

A complaint says unfired armor-piercing bullets found inside the Las Vegas hotel room where the attack was launched on Oct. 1 contained the fingerprints of ammunition dealer Douglas Haig of Arizona.

The complaint filed Friday in federal court in Phoenix says Haig didn’t have a license to manufacture armor-piercing ammunition.

He was charged shortly before holding a news conference Friday. He said he noticed nothing suspicious when he sold 720 rounds of ammunition to Stephen Paddock in the weeks before the attack that killed 58 people.

Haig is a 55-year-old aerospace engineer who sold ammunition as a hobby for about 25 years.

___

11:50 a.m.

An Arizona man who sold ammunition to the gunman in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history says his one-time customer didn’t raise suspicions that he planned to commit any crimes.

Douglas Haig said at a news conference Friday that he met Stephen Paddock at a Phoenix gun show in the weeks before the Oct. 1 shooting in Las Vegas that killed 58 people.

The sale was later completed at Haig’s home in the Phoenix suburb of Mesa.

Haig was named as a “person of interest” in the investigation.

But a law enforcement official has since told The Associated Press that he isn’t believed to have committed a federal crime or to have had any knowledge of the attack.

The official wasn’t authorized to discuss the investigation and spoke on condition of anonymity.

— Associated Press writer Michael Balsamo

___

12:30 a.m.

An Arizona man plans to speak out about his experience in selling ammunition to the gunman in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.

Douglas Haig is scheduled to hold a news conference Friday in Chandler to discuss his sale to Stephen Paddock.

This week, Haig said he couldn’t detect anything wrong with Paddock.

Haig was named as a “person of interest” in the Oct. 1 shooting in Las Vegas that killed 58 people.

But a law enforcement official has since told The Associated Press that Haig isn’t believed to have committed a federal crime or to have had any knowledge of the attack.

The official wasn’t authorized to discuss the investigation and spoke on condition of anonymity.

It’s unknown whether the ammunition Haig sold to Paddock was used in the attack.

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 9:36 pm
by ssracer
So...aside from the fact that all rifle ammunition would be considered “armor piercing” by police standards....what difference would “armor piercing” or “not armor piercing” make against a bunch of non armor wearing civilians at a concert


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2018 6:35 am
by Niceguy
ssracer wrote:So...aside from the fact that all rifle ammunition would be considered “armor piercing” by police standards....what difference would “armor piercing” or “not armor piercing” make against a bunch of non armor wearing civilians at a concert


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
It's for the kids you racist pig!!!! :llama:

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2018 5:10 pm
by iron369
ssracer wrote:So...aside from the fact that all rifle ammunition would be considered “armor piercing” by police standards....what difference would “armor piercing” or “not armor piercing” make against a bunch of non armor wearing civilians at a concert


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Image



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Las Vegas massacre

Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2018 8:56 pm
by WLJ
ssracer wrote:So...aside from the fact that all rifle ammunition would be considered “armor piercing” by police standards....what difference would “armor piercing” or “not armor piercing” make against a bunch of non armor wearing civilians at a concert


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Whatever the FBI can do to defect attention away from the "memo"