Re: Gun Control Watch
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 11:28 am
Cop not guilty in Freddie gray trial-riots about to commence
For firearms enthusiasts from lovers of Glock, AR-15, XD, 1911s, shotguns, AK-47s, to black powder. For shooters, hunters, LEO'S, military, or casual enthusiasts. KAC is about firearms, and all the good things in life. Welcome!
https://kentuckyarmoryclub.com/
What they need to recognize is that there are millions upon millions of these weapons out there that are not being used for anything other than recreational target shooting or competition. Jon, from the YouTube channel, the gun collective said something that was pretty insightful the other day. Basically, thinking about the number of vehicles on the road every day and no one ever thinks twice about driving 60-70 mph on a two lane road with cars heading in the opposite direction at roughly the same speed. You just assume the other driver is going to adhere to traffic rules and stay in their lane, not come into your lane and crash into you head on. Guns should be the same. You should be able to assume that the owner of a gun will adhere to social norms and not go on a killing spree with it or just wantonly shoot the gun up in the air. In fact, that is how most law abiding gun owners act. One kook goes off and shoots up a public place and suddenly, everyone who owns a gun is a crazed killer. The stupidity of that logic is staggering.WLJ wrote:Misdirected Hostility: Democratic Senator Says People Who Own AR-15s Are Buying Them 'To Do Bad Things'
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/ ... e-n2181918
The fact is, the AR-15, the gun that (Omar) Mateen used, that’s a weapon of war; it’s advertised as being able do technologically advances in killing people that previous weapons have been unable to do and somebody who is buying that kind of a weapon isn’t buying it for target shooting,” she said. “They’re not buying it to go out and hunt deer. You don’t need an AK-47 or an AR-15 to hunt deer. They’re buying it to do bad things and we need to recognize that and address it.”
The world has always been crazyNolan wrote:World going crazy today
watching him whine now during his press conferenceNolan wrote:Immigration policy blocked by Supreme Court 4-4-bammy ain't happy
Let me guess, the court went against the will of the people?jmeister wrote:watching him whine now during his press conferenceNolan wrote:Immigration policy blocked by Supreme Court 4-4-bammy ain't happy
cliffs...WLJ wrote:Let me guess, the court went against the will of the people?jmeister wrote:watching him whine now during his press conferenceNolan wrote:Immigration policy blocked by Supreme Court 4-4-bammy ain't happy
funny...no one wants to mention the NRA backed legislation that the Democrats shot down in the senate...WLJ wrote:
^^^^^^^^^ x's 2!jackalo626 wrote:They are the insane ones. Who the hell can be so illogical and get through the day without swallowing their own tongue or drowning in a glass of water? Move out of the country if it's so great elsewhere.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
What he saidWyldman wrote:Yarmouth is a back-stabbing traitorous idiot and should be arrested.
Crush, kill, mangle, maim, destroy.
In a unanimous ruling issued Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit rejected Hollis’ arguments, categorically noting that “machine guns are not protected arms under the Second Amendment.”
The court explained that the leading Supreme Court precedent on the right to keep and bear arms, 2008’s District of Columbia v. Heller, only protected individual handgun possession for “defense of hearth and home.”
The caucus said its members should be "as disruptive to Speaker [Paul] Ryan [R-Wis.] as possible next week" when the House gets back on Tuesday as part of a "day of action on the floor in regards to gun violence," the memo, sent to Democratic offices, said.
Members will give speeches pushing for more restrictions on the possession and use of guns, the Examiner reported. They will also attend a House Rules Committee hearing on Tuesday afternoon, where legislation on terrorism and gun control will be addressed.
"During Votes – Members are encouraged to have a picture (not poster board, but a printed piece of paper with an image of a constituent killed by a firearm)," the memo said.
Congressional Democrats introduced legislation Tuesday to crackdown on children's access to "military-style weapons" in an effort to prevent accidental gun deaths.
The proposal — from Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) — would ban people younger than 16 from having or firing a machine gun or assault weapon.
ADVERTISEMENT
“The small hands of children and big power of machine guns are a deadly combination,” Markey said in a statement. “Assault weapons are weapons of war and should not be allowed in the hands of children."
The ban would include blocking kids from firing the guns at a gun show or a gun range.
The proposal has the support of outside groups, including the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. The children of Charlie Vacca, a firearms instructor who was accidentally killed in 2014 by a 9-year-old girl he was teaching to shoot an Uzi submachine gun, are also supporting the bill.
"We’re now calling upon kids across the nation and their parents support this brave bill by signing our petition. Kids and assault weapons don’t mix," they said in a statement.
They've also launched a petition, noting that the United States has age restrictions on other "potentially hazardous activities."
Efforts to pass new gun control legislation have stalled in recent years and face an uphill battle in a Republican-controlled Congress. But lawmakers argued that setting an age limit for the use of machine guns or assault weapons should get bipartisan support.
"This bill is a common sense step to prevent more families like the Vacca family from having to mourn the loss of loved ones in preventable accidents involving powerful weapons," Gallego said in a statement.