Colt(s) vs. Springfield vs Remington 1911 showdown!
Colt(s) vs. Springfield vs Remington 1911 showdown!
So today I decided to do a comparative test between a few Colts, my Springfield Range Officer and my Remington R1. I wanted to see if I was able to really tell a difference in them at 25 yards freehanded.
First let me disclose I am not a bullseye shooter and never have been. I shoot for center mass and have learned shooting on Glocks, so this is basically the first time I have ever shot a 1911. Also, I may have a lot of 1911's but I really don't know much about them. And for me, 25 yards is a LOT farther than it sounds!
I was shooting for center dots on plain paper. I'm using winchester white box .45 and Magtech .38 super +P(Colt)
First up was my original 70 series Colt Gold Cup. This gun feels beautiful but I have never even shot it until today. First gun out of the box and I was all over the paper. Made me realize me aiming sucked. I tried a second time after a few other guns aand managed to get my tightest group(I circled it but you can't see it well in the picture-7 rounds within about 4-5 inches 2 o'clock from dot). This made me feel a lot better about the gun because it is clearly more accurate than me. Trigger is sweet and the sights are okay(Elliason). Here is the target after 3 mags(third mag I think I rushed again and put them all over the place)
Next up is another Colt, series 80 in .38 super. This gun shoots really really smooth and makes me want another .38 super to add to the collection. I started off pretty good with it, although slightly right of target. 2 mags and I was happy with the grouping. I honestly couldn't tell a difference in the recoil between the .38 super and .45. Both feel about the same.
Next up was the Springfield Range Officer. I have heard so many good things about this gun....and now I know why! It shoots like a dream! Feels great and smooth and all around good! I LOVE this one!
Next up was a Remington R1. I was sleptical about this one but it turned out nicer than expected! It felt a slight bit "sloppy" but that might have been my brain tricking me. I think I threw a few outside the paper with this one. For the price I paid($550) this is a hell of a 1911.
Last was a new Colt series 70 remake in .45. Surprisingly this one was the one I had the most issues on getting on target. I was all over the paper with it. It feels solid but I just didn't shoot it well. I only put one mag on target but threw a few. I don't think I liked the simple sights.
Overall I think I liked the Range Officer and Gold Cup the most, followed very closely by the Colt .38 super(which is RIGHT behind the other two). I think the Colt 70 series comes in forth even though I shot it poorly. The Remington R1 comes last but only because someone HAS to come in last. It's a great gun, but I would take a Colt over it even if the R1 shot better.
There's my unscientific opinion.
First let me disclose I am not a bullseye shooter and never have been. I shoot for center mass and have learned shooting on Glocks, so this is basically the first time I have ever shot a 1911. Also, I may have a lot of 1911's but I really don't know much about them. And for me, 25 yards is a LOT farther than it sounds!
I was shooting for center dots on plain paper. I'm using winchester white box .45 and Magtech .38 super +P(Colt)
First up was my original 70 series Colt Gold Cup. This gun feels beautiful but I have never even shot it until today. First gun out of the box and I was all over the paper. Made me realize me aiming sucked. I tried a second time after a few other guns aand managed to get my tightest group(I circled it but you can't see it well in the picture-7 rounds within about 4-5 inches 2 o'clock from dot). This made me feel a lot better about the gun because it is clearly more accurate than me. Trigger is sweet and the sights are okay(Elliason). Here is the target after 3 mags(third mag I think I rushed again and put them all over the place)
Next up is another Colt, series 80 in .38 super. This gun shoots really really smooth and makes me want another .38 super to add to the collection. I started off pretty good with it, although slightly right of target. 2 mags and I was happy with the grouping. I honestly couldn't tell a difference in the recoil between the .38 super and .45. Both feel about the same.
Next up was the Springfield Range Officer. I have heard so many good things about this gun....and now I know why! It shoots like a dream! Feels great and smooth and all around good! I LOVE this one!
Next up was a Remington R1. I was sleptical about this one but it turned out nicer than expected! It felt a slight bit "sloppy" but that might have been my brain tricking me. I think I threw a few outside the paper with this one. For the price I paid($550) this is a hell of a 1911.
Last was a new Colt series 70 remake in .45. Surprisingly this one was the one I had the most issues on getting on target. I was all over the paper with it. It feels solid but I just didn't shoot it well. I only put one mag on target but threw a few. I don't think I liked the simple sights.
Overall I think I liked the Range Officer and Gold Cup the most, followed very closely by the Colt .38 super(which is RIGHT behind the other two). I think the Colt 70 series comes in forth even though I shot it poorly. The Remington R1 comes last but only because someone HAS to come in last. It's a great gun, but I would take a Colt over it even if the R1 shot better.
There's my unscientific opinion.
-
- Global Mod
- Posts: 12053
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:50 pm
- Location: Louisville
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 22 times
Re: Colt(s) vs. Springfield vs Remington 1911 showdown!
The simple GI sights I had on my Springfield made me shoot terrible and that's why I sold mine. Thanks for review.
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:08 pm
- Location: KY
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Colt(s) vs. Springfield vs Remington 1911 showdown!
my range officer is more accurate than I am. I am catching up though. thinking about getting a Loaded to go along with my range officer and my loaded ultra compact
- mtchbrian
- KAC Member
- Posts: 10280
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:36 pm
- Location: Bullitt County
- Has liked: 2 times
- Been liked: 8 times
Re: Colt(s) vs. Springfield vs Remington 1911 showdown!
^^^^what she said^^^^^^(I gotta pay attention to who is signed in.)
Proud husband, father of 3, Iraqi Freedom Veteran, and Operation New Dawn veteran.
Re: Colt(s) vs. Springfield vs Remington 1911 showdown!
Was working on an R1 today, same exact as yours.
Put a bunch of Wilson goodies on it and cerakoted it.
In factory form I wasn't that impressed with it but with some work and a few goodies it feels much better.
Put a bunch of Wilson goodies on it and cerakoted it.
In factory form I wasn't that impressed with it but with some work and a few goodies it feels much better.
Marcus wrote:KAC, marrying above their league since 2012.
Re: Colt(s) vs. Springfield vs Remington 1911 showdown!
Not sure I like the look of the random stainless parts over a coated/blue gun. That thumb safety needs to be stainless at least to keep the theme going.
-
- Founding Father
- Posts: 8287
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:06 pm
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 63 times
Re: Colt(s) vs. Springfield vs Remington 1911 showdown!
He said that he's waiting on the stainless safety. Easy on the pain meds there mike.Mike wrote:Not sure I like the look of the random stainless parts over a coated/blue gun. That thumb safety needs to be stainless at least to keep the theme going.
Mandy wrote:I meant Marcus post, he's like ninja slicer, he's nice he's nice he's nice, ....SWISH... he cuts your effin head off
Re: Colt(s) vs. Springfield vs Remington 1911 showdown!
Marcus wrote:He said that he's waiting on the stainless safety. Easy on the pain meds there mike.Mike wrote:Not sure I like the look of the random stainless parts over a coated/blue gun. That thumb safety needs to be stainless at least to keep the theme going.
You're right, missed that entire sentence. That will make it look a little better.
I put some VZ operator II's on mine and like the look. It's actually a nice feeling and great shooting gun. For the price (I paid at least) it's a great bargain 1911 that shoots really good. But, we all know, nothing beats a Colt!
- dbh
- KAC Member
- Posts: 5219
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:33 pm
- Location: The Twilight Zone
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Colt(s) vs. Springfield vs Remington 1911 showdown!
VZ grips look baller but for comfort and tactical shooting you can't beat Ergo Grips and they are about 1/3 the cost. I put VZ's on my Colt and have Ergos on my Sig TacOps.
Re: Colt(s) vs. Springfield vs Remington 1911 showdown!
It's done in graphite black cerakote. And like he said I forgot to order it so it wasn't in yet.Mike wrote:Not sure I like the look of the random stainless parts over a coated/blue gun. That thumb safety needs to be stainless at least to keep the theme going.
I just do want the customer wants, he asked for all stainless controls. The trigger did make a big difference.
Marcus wrote:KAC, marrying above their league since 2012.