AMD 65 vs AMD 65
- Toddstang
- Global Mod
- Posts: 13901
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:52 pm
- Location: In A Van, Down by the river.
- Has liked: 145 times
- Been liked: 98 times
AMD 65 vs AMD 65
Ok, getting really tired of the internet rumblings and gun store talk of which is the real AMD 65.
First off, Nodak Spud/DC Industries (Dan Coonan, owner of Nodak) built the AMD 65 from kits ( A few hundred to be exact) and then sold recievers to CAI for builds as well ( a few hundred). The Nodaks/DCI's have 1.5 Thick recievers and use authentic AMD parts kits.
Next comes the FEG TGI AMD 65's that came along later. A shit ton of these were imported from Hungary as single stack rifles and sent to Tennessee Gun Works to be opened up to accept double stack magazines. These were made in Hungary, but they are not the original AMD 65 like everyone keeps saying they are.
Take a look at any FEG model and compare it to the Nodak build. Yes some parts are the same, but some aren't. The barrel's and flash suppressors are a dead give away for one, the recievers, of course are another (The FEG is 1.0 thick) as well as some of the sight bases.
Anyhow, heard two guys talking about AMD's today at a gun store and didn't feel like jumping in as a know it all, but wanted to post up what I know about these guns.
BTW, Here is my Nodak Spud/DC I built AMD 65:
First off, Nodak Spud/DC Industries (Dan Coonan, owner of Nodak) built the AMD 65 from kits ( A few hundred to be exact) and then sold recievers to CAI for builds as well ( a few hundred). The Nodaks/DCI's have 1.5 Thick recievers and use authentic AMD parts kits.
Next comes the FEG TGI AMD 65's that came along later. A shit ton of these were imported from Hungary as single stack rifles and sent to Tennessee Gun Works to be opened up to accept double stack magazines. These were made in Hungary, but they are not the original AMD 65 like everyone keeps saying they are.
Take a look at any FEG model and compare it to the Nodak build. Yes some parts are the same, but some aren't. The barrel's and flash suppressors are a dead give away for one, the recievers, of course are another (The FEG is 1.0 thick) as well as some of the sight bases.
Anyhow, heard two guys talking about AMD's today at a gun store and didn't feel like jumping in as a know it all, but wanted to post up what I know about these guns.
BTW, Here is my Nodak Spud/DC I built AMD 65:
- son of liberty
- KAC Member
- Posts: 1759
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:22 pm
- Location: Carrollton
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
- 1fastmach1
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:21 pm
- Location: Elizabethtown
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
I don't know anything about these so I've gotta ask. You mention all these names and manufactures but the receiver is stamped Century. What's that all about?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk.
- Toddstang
- Global Mod
- Posts: 13901
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:52 pm
- Location: In A Van, Down by the river.
- Has liked: 145 times
- Been liked: 98 times
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
Another difference in the two were the price tags. The FEG's could be had from Centerfire all day for $399 while the ones from builds were going for $550+
-
- Founding Father
- Posts: 8267
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:06 pm
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 62 times
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
I agree with everything you said Todd.
That said, I've owned both and they functioned EXACTLY the same.
That said, I've owned both and they functioned EXACTLY the same.
Mandy wrote:I meant Marcus post, he's like ninja slicer, he's nice he's nice he's nice, ....SWISH... he cuts your effin head off
- gaston_kalash
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2013 11:09 pm
- Location: somerset
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
The barrel lengths are different aren't they a true Hungarian would of had a 12.5" barrel. I read a lot about kalashes but the amd has yo be my least favorite
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
SI JE PUIS
-
- Founding Father
- Posts: 4360
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:36 pm
- Location: The Boro
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 19 times
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
I like to refer to those as the good old days. I picked one of the FEG builds and went through several before I picked one based on the advice you gave me Todd. First three that came out had the awful cut and grind marks on the rear of the receiver.Toddstang wrote:Another difference in the two were the price tags. The FEG's could be had from Centerfire all day for $399 while the ones from builds were going for $550+
- 1fastmach1
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:21 pm
- Location: Elizabethtown
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
Toddstang wrote:Ok, getting really tired of the internet rumblings and gun store talk of which is the real AMD 65.
First off, Nodak Spud/DC Industries (Dan Coonan, owner of Nodak) built the AMD 65 from kits ( A few hundred to be exact) and then sold recievers to CAI for builds as well ( a few hundred). The Nodaks/DCI's have 1.5 Thick recievers and use authentic AMD parts kits.
Next comes the FEG TGI AMD 65's that came along later. A shit ton of these were imported from Hungary as single stack rifles and sent to Tennessee Gun Works to be opened up to accept double stack magazines. These were made in Hungary, but they are not the original AMD 65 like everyone keeps saying they are.
Take a look at any FEG model and compare it to the Nodak build. Yes some parts are the same, but some aren't. The barrel's and flash suppressors are a dead give away for one, the recievers, of course are another (The FEG is 1.0 thick) as well as some of the sight bases.
Anyhow, heard two guys talking about AMD's today at a gun store and didn't feel like jumping in as a know it all, but wanted to post up what I know about these guns.
BTW, Here is my Nodak Spud/DC I built AMD 65:
That's a good looking rifle. I bet it's not very comfy to shoot with that stock on the back of it. Regardless of how well these are supposed to be, having the century name on it makes me extremely nervous.
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 6383
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:48 pm
- Location: Metro Louisville
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 15 times
- Contact:
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
Century is the maker of their AMD-65.1fastmach1 wrote:I don't know anything about these so I've gotta ask. You mention all these names and manufactures but the receiver is stamped Century. What's that all about?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk.
No sure but Novak could have made the receiver with a variance letter that said they did have to mark them.
Some receivers have " makers mark " on the side and underside .
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 6383
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:48 pm
- Location: Metro Louisville
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 15 times
- Contact:
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
Got one in to put the AFG onnemo wrote:Never had an issue with my FEG TGI build.
He wants a sling loop on the side and that the trigger was not returning.
Nepot, you have a good crisp return or did you have to replace it?
Last edited by guncrank1 on Mon Dec 30, 2013 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- 1fastmach1
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:21 pm
- Location: Elizabethtown
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
That's good to know cranky. Thanks for the info good sir. I have normal ole AK myself but I like it.guncrank1 wrote:Century is the maker of their AMD-65.1fastmach1 wrote:I don't know anything about these so I've gotta ask. You mention all these names and manufactures but the receiver is stamped Century. What's that all about?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk.
No sure but Novak could have made the receiver with a variance letter that said they did have to mark them.
Some receivers have " makers mark " on the side and underside .
-
- KAC Member
- Posts: 6383
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:48 pm
- Location: Metro Louisville
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 15 times
- Contact:
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
I ment to say Century is the "maker" of their guns and are marked as such1fastmach1 wrote:That's good to know cranky. Thanks for the info good sir. I have normal ole AK myself but I like it.guncrank1 wrote:Century is the maker of their AMD-65.1fastmach1 wrote:I don't know anything about these so I've gotta ask. You mention all these names and manufactures but the receiver is stamped Century. What's that all about?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk.
No sure but Novak could have made the receiver with a variance letter that said they did have to mark them.
Some receivers have " makers mark " on the side and underside .
- 1fastmach1
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:21 pm
- Location: Elizabethtown
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
I figured that's what you meant.guncrank1 wrote:I ment to say Century is the "maker" of their guns and are marked as such1fastmach1 wrote:That's good to know cranky. Thanks for the info good sir. I have normal ole AK myself but I like it.guncrank1 wrote:Century is the maker of their AMD-65.1fastmach1 wrote:I don't know anything about these so I've gotta ask. You mention all these names and manufactures but the receiver is stamped Century. What's that all about?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk.
No sure but Novak could have made the receiver with a variance letter that said they did have to mark them.
Some receivers have " makers mark " on the side and underside .
- Toddstang
- Global Mod
- Posts: 13901
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:52 pm
- Location: In A Van, Down by the river.
- Has liked: 145 times
- Been liked: 98 times
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
This is my favorite, most accurate AK. Even with the wire stock I can still hit cans and bowling pins at 100 yards with open sights.
Century has been building AK type rifles forever. Anyone, including myself can build an AK. There aint much too these things that you could mess up. Now Century building anything other than an AK would make me nervous.
And yes Cranky, Nodak made AMD recievers for years up till about 4 years ago.
I have heard that a few of the FEG's were cut down too much causing mag wobble and a few not cut enough causing some mags not to fit. Nothing that would stop me from buying one.
Century has been building AK type rifles forever. Anyone, including myself can build an AK. There aint much too these things that you could mess up. Now Century building anything other than an AK would make me nervous.
And yes Cranky, Nodak made AMD recievers for years up till about 4 years ago.
I have heard that a few of the FEG's were cut down too much causing mag wobble and a few not cut enough causing some mags not to fit. Nothing that would stop me from buying one.
- 1fastmach1
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:21 pm
- Location: Elizabethtown
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
Off topic but mags are tight in my AK. I've only used tapco mags in mine. I have to trim tapco mags to get them to lock up. Is that normal for tapco? I wonder how a steel mag would lock up.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- Toddstang
- Global Mod
- Posts: 13901
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:52 pm
- Location: In A Van, Down by the river.
- Has liked: 145 times
- Been liked: 98 times
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
WASR, Yugo, what model AK?1fastmach1 wrote:Off topic but mags are tight in my AK. I've only used tapco mags in mine. I have to trim tapco mags to get them to lock up. Is that normal for tapco? I wonder how a steel mag would lock up.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- 1fastmach1
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:21 pm
- Location: Elizabethtown
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
It's an m+m arms ak. I got a good deal on it at keens a few months back. I've never had a problem with it. It runs great.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- Toddstang
- Global Mod
- Posts: 13901
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:52 pm
- Location: In A Van, Down by the river.
- Has liked: 145 times
- Been liked: 98 times
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
Nice AK. I would try getting original European, Russian, etc mags and trying the fit on them.1fastmach1 wrote:It's an m+m arms ak. I got a good deal on it at keens a few months back. I've never had a problem with it. It runs great.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- 1fastmach1
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:21 pm
- Location: Elizabethtown
- Has liked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: AMD 65 vs AMD 65
Alrighty. Thanks for the tip. I'll try to find some. 111 had some steel ak mags on sale for like 7 bucks last time I was there. They had a whole crate full. I'm not sure what kind they were or if they were any count though.Toddstang wrote:Nice AK. I would try getting original European, Russian, etc mags and trying the fit on them.1fastmach1 wrote:It's an m+m arms ak. I got a good deal on it at keens a few months back. I've never had a problem with it. It runs great.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk